[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal

    On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > one way to make it safe/reviewable is to runtime warn if
    > local_irq_disable() is called from a !preempt_count() section. But this
    > will uncover quite some code. There's some code in the VM, in the
    > buffer-cache, in the RCU code - etc. that uses per-CPU data structures
    > and assumes non-preemptability of local_irq_disable().

    Are you talking about make those section preemptible? Or a safety problem
    in the current method.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-11 18:23    [W:0.019 / U:210.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site