lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1

* Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > could you send me the .config you used for the PREEMPT_RT tests? Also,
> > you used -47-08, which was well prior the current round of performance
> > improvements, so you might want to re-run with something like -48-06 or
> > better.
>
> Much to our dislike, we only noticed that we forgot to disable the
> debug options after posting the results :/ So, in all fairness, we
> will be redoing the tests on PREEMPT_RT early next week. [...]

yeah, i suspected something like that - the PREEMPT_RT latency numbers
were so out of whack with anything i've measured on similar boxes. The
debugging features on PREEMPT_RT are powerful but have a high overhead.

could you send me your PREEMPT_RT .config? (whichever version you have
handy) That's the easiest way i can tell you which options to watch out
for.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-11 16:59    [W:0.437 / U:0.936 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site