[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1

--Con Kolivas <> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 15:22:30 +1000):

> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:14, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> --"Martin J. Bligh" <> wrote (on Friday, June 10, 2005 > >
> OK, I backed out those 4, and the degredation mostly went away.
>> > See
>> >
>> > moe.png
>> >
>> > and more specifically, see the +p5150 near the right hand side.
>> > I don't think it's quite as good as mainline, but much closer.
>> > I did this run with HZ=1000, and the the one with no scheduler
>> > patches at all with HZ=250, so I'll try to do a run that's more
>> > directly comparable as well
>> OK, that makes it look much more like mainline. Looks like you were still
>> revising the details of your patch Con ... once you're ready, drop me a
>> URL for it, and I'll make the system whack on that too.
> Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply
> directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very
> grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at
> this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes more
> complex.

Kicked it off - should appear in a few hours as


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-11 07:59    [W:0.053 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site