Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:56:25 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 |
| |
--Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 15:22:30 +1000):
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:14, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> --"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote (on Friday, June 10, 2005 > > > OK, I backed out those 4, and the degredation mostly went away. >> > See >> > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/perf/kernbench. >> > moe.png >> > >> > and more specifically, see the +p5150 near the right hand side. >> > I don't think it's quite as good as mainline, but much closer. >> > I did this run with HZ=1000, and the the one with no scheduler >> > patches at all with HZ=250, so I'll try to do a run that's more >> > directly comparable as well >> >> OK, that makes it look much more like mainline. Looks like you were still >> revising the details of your patch Con ... once you're ready, drop me a >> URL for it, and I'll make the system whack on that too. > > Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply > directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very > grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at > this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes more > complex.
Kicked it off - should appear in a few hours as http://mbligh.org/abat/con_sched_test
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |