[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1

    --Con Kolivas <> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 15:22:30 +1000):

    > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:14, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    >> --"Martin J. Bligh" <> wrote (on Friday, June 10, 2005 > >
    > OK, I backed out those 4, and the degredation mostly went away.
    >> > See
    >> >
    >> > moe.png
    >> >
    >> > and more specifically, see the +p5150 near the right hand side.
    >> > I don't think it's quite as good as mainline, but much closer.
    >> > I did this run with HZ=1000, and the the one with no scheduler
    >> > patches at all with HZ=250, so I'll try to do a run that's more
    >> > directly comparable as well
    >> OK, that makes it look much more like mainline. Looks like you were still
    >> revising the details of your patch Con ... once you're ready, drop me a
    >> URL for it, and I'll make the system whack on that too.
    > Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply
    > directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very
    > grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at
    > this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes more
    > complex.

    Kicked it off - should appear in a few hours as


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-11 07:59    [W:0.020 / U:10.788 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site