lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1
    On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

    > Kristian Benoit wrote:
    > > For the past few weeks, we've been conducting comparison tests between
    > > PREEMPT_RT and the Adeos nanokernel. As was clear from previous discussion,
    > > we've been open to be proven wrong regarding endorsement of either method.
    > > Hence, this comparison was done in order to better understand the impact
    > > of each method vis-a-vis vanilla Linux.
    > >
    >
    > This is wonderful data, thanks very much for putting in the work.
    > I hope this thread and future threads on this topic can be steered
    > more towards technical facts and numbers, as that is the only way
    > to make sane choices.

    I think it'd also be interesting to see results with a heavy scheduling
    load (say make -jN). Not only would this clobber caches, it'd also show
    possible issues regarding contention or long preemption disabled points.

    Zwane
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-11 16:31    [W:5.682 / U:0.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site