Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:28:27 -0600 (MDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1 |
| |
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Kristian Benoit wrote: > > For the past few weeks, we've been conducting comparison tests between > > PREEMPT_RT and the Adeos nanokernel. As was clear from previous discussion, > > we've been open to be proven wrong regarding endorsement of either method. > > Hence, this comparison was done in order to better understand the impact > > of each method vis-a-vis vanilla Linux. > > > > This is wonderful data, thanks very much for putting in the work. > I hope this thread and future threads on this topic can be steered > more towards technical facts and numbers, as that is the only way > to make sane choices.
I think it'd also be interesting to see results with a heavy scheduling load (say make -jN). Not only would this clobber caches, it'd also show possible issues regarding contention or long preemption disabled points.
Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |