lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 11 Jun 2005 06:32:31 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06
* Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote:

> Depends on the configuration options. If you used the same configs 
> they should be the same but if you activated PREEMPT_RT it should slow 
> things down due to the overhead of irq-threading and mutexes instead 
> of spinlocks - although I am surprised the factor is _that_ big!

one has to make sure the default debug options are disabled.  
(DEADLOCK_DETECT, PREEMPT_DEBUG, etc.) But even then there will be 
considerable overhead. Until recently, the overhead used to be even 
bigger. Note that hackbench is pretty much the worst-case for 
PREEMPT_RT: lots of locking and scheduling done and we compare the UP 
kernel to the SMP kernel in essence. (in fact PREEMPT_RT's locking is 
currently higher overhead than SMP)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-11 04:40    [W:1.383 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans