[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
    On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:13, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > --Con Kolivas <> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 > >
    Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply
    > > directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very
    > > grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at
    > > this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes
    > > more complex.
    > It's much better ... but still a degredation - see point p5181 on:
    > Only really seems to hurt the NUMA box (the x440 one ... elm3b67 ... is
    > still trying to find it's ass with both hands). I'm not necessarily saying
    > it's a problem ... not sure what the benefits of the patch are, but it's a
    > data point, at least ?

    Thanks a lot!

    Just checking the numbering of the test runs with you. This is the blue line
    order as plotted on the graph:

    5181 is with this patch
    4947 is mm1?
    5150 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out
    5081 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out and Hz changed to 100?
    5169 is ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-12 00:24    [W:0.019 / U:10.640 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site