[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:13, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --Con Kolivas <> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 > >
Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply
> > directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very
> > grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at
> > this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes
> > more complex.
> It's much better ... but still a degredation - see point p5181 on:
> Only really seems to hurt the NUMA box (the x440 one ... elm3b67 ... is
> still trying to find it's ass with both hands). I'm not necessarily saying
> it's a problem ... not sure what the benefits of the patch are, but it's a
> data point, at least ?

Thanks a lot!

Just checking the numbering of the test runs with you. This is the blue line
order as plotted on the graph:

5181 is with this patch
4947 is mm1?
5150 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out
5081 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out and Hz changed to 100?
5169 is ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-12 00:24    [W:0.077 / U:4.932 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site