Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:55:21 +0300 | From | Mika Penttilä <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal |
| |
Daniel Walker wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, [UTF-8] Mika Penttilä wrote: > > > >>ok, so maybe the safe way is to enforce threaded softirq with the soft >>irq flag. >> >> >> > >That's already handled, my changes are used only when you turn on >PREEMPT_RT , and PREEMPT_RT forces softirq threading. > >Daniel > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > Ok, so everything's fine :)
Thanks, --Mika
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |