Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:29:49 +0300 | From | Mika Penttilä <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal |
| |
Daniel Walker wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Mika Penttil� wrote: > > >>Not with !softirq_preemption, then we take the immediate path and >>process soft irqs on irq exit. >> >> > >My changes aren't used in that case. > >Daniel > > > > ok, so maybe the safe way is to enforce threaded softirq with the soft irq flag.
--Mika
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |