Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:38:04 +0200 | From | Eric Piel <> | Subject | Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread |
| |
11.06.2005 02:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote/a écrit: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote: >>What about using the way you wrote it at the beginning of the section: >>"Probability of missing a deadline only because of a hardware failure" > > > Good point, I may just need to invert the whole thing, so that it > becomes something like: > > i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software, > ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 0 corresponding > to the hardest possible hard realtime. > > But then the "p^n" becomes "1-(1-p)^n". Bleah. Yes, it seems language doesn't fit well with mathematics ;-)
> > OK, how about the following? > > i. Probability of meeting a deadline in absence of hardware > failure, ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 > corresponding to the hardest possible hard realtime. > Sounds good!
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |