![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote: > I've read the whole summary and really appreciated it. It's clear, > precise and objective. Glad you like it! > Just a small change to "1 - QoS": > > >b. For each service: > > > > i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software, > > ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding > > to the hardest possible hard realtime. > > I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the > beginning of the section): > Probability of not missing any deadline due to software Good catch! How about the following? i. Probability of meeting a deadline due to software, ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding to the hardest possible hard realtime. Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting". Thanx, Paul > Thanks again for writing this summary, > Eric > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-11 01:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||