lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 10 Jun 2005 16:04:33 -0700
From"Paul E. McKenney" <>
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote:
> I've read the whole summary and really appreciated it. It's clear,
> precise and objective.

Glad you like it!

> Just a small change to "1 - QoS":
>
> >b. For each service:
> >
> > i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software,
> > ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
> > to the hardest possible hard realtime.
>
> I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the
> beginning of the section):
> Probability of not missing any deadline due to software

Good catch! How about the following?

i. Probability of meeting a deadline due to software,
ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
to the hardest possible hard realtime.

Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting".

Thanx, Paul

> Thanks again for writing this summary,
> Eric
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-11 01:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2010