Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:04:33 -0700 | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | | Subject | Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread |
| |
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote: > I've read the whole summary and really appreciated it. It's clear, > precise and objective.
Glad you like it!
> Just a small change to "1 - QoS": > > >b. For each service: > > > > i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software, > > ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding > > to the hardest possible hard realtime. > > I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the > beginning of the section): > Probability of not missing any deadline due to software
Good catch! How about the following?
i. Probability of meeting a deadline due to software, ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding to the hardest possible hard realtime.
Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting".
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks again for writing this summary, > Eric > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |