Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:59:32 -0700 | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance | From | Bill Huey (hui) <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:02:44PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > This is not the purpose of the patch, nor will it ever be. RT apps don't > depend on this property as was previously mentioned in this thread. ... > Again, this has been covered previously by this thread. It's ultimately > about writing RT apps that have a more sophisticated use that RTAI or > RT Linux.
Andrea,
I mean those above comments to be hard RT.
I do mention a syscall use and expression of these RT properties, but it's really not hard RT but something else closer to soft RT threads. I blew it by using the wrong definition there.
They still all have to interact with each other in a temporarly protected way so that latency is propagated through each RT domain (soft, hard, none) in the app.
bill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |