Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 23:09:15 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:56:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I have no permission from the customer who actually payed the survey to > publish the results yet. But I continue asking for it.
Ok, thanks for asking ;)
> I have a slightly outdated patch with that around on top of RT, but it > introduces yet another level of ugliness. > You must carefully identify the places where you really need the > hard_local_irq_dis/enable(). It's not hard though. > > I used it in the early days of PREEMPT_RT to identify the IRQ off > sections and some other deadlocking scenarios. I kept this always as an > option for adding on top of Ingos implementation to close the gap to > "ruby".
I see. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |