Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:38:03 +0200 | | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:33:07AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > in a wider context of all the other statements within that claim, the main > part being what I quoted earlier.
Ok great, I trust your patent knowledge given your background ;).
It's very reassuring that I was wrong and preempt-rt is not covered by the patent. Until now I really understood that redefining an hard irq disable to a soft irq disable was forbidden at large. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |