Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:19:34 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
Paulo Marques wrote: > This seems like the RTAI kind of nano-kernel approach and has nothing to > do with the way the RT-PREEMPT patch works, AFAICS.
Please read it again. Nanokernels/hypervisors are not an RTOS. They do not schedule tasks or povide RT services. They only allow client OSes to share hardware. IBM has been doing this for over 30 years. As for RTAI, it is running side-by-side with another OS, it is not running under Linux in a master-slave relationship.
I know things are polarized in this thread, but please avoid FUD.
Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |