[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

    Paulo Marques wrote:
    > This seems like the RTAI kind of nano-kernel approach and has nothing to
    > do with the way the RT-PREEMPT patch works, AFAICS.

    Please read it again. Nanokernels/hypervisors are not an RTOS. They do
    not schedule tasks or povide RT services. They only allow client OSes
    to share hardware. IBM has been doing this for over 30 years. As for
    RTAI, it is running side-by-side with another OS, it is not running
    under Linux in a master-slave relationship.

    I know things are polarized in this thread, but please avoid FUD.

    Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
    Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits || || 1-866-677-4546
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-01 17:22    [W:0.019 / U:6.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site