Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.11.8 + UML/x86_64 (2.6.12-rc3+) = oops | From | Antoine Martin <> | Date | Sun, 08 May 2005 20:51:26 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 12:45 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:35:02PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > > The only extra patch applied on top of what is on the web page (as per > > Jeff's instructions) is the mconsole-exec patch, and AFAIK it wouldn't > > affect the code above. > > mconsole-exec, if it's the patch I'm thinking of, is a patch to the UML > kernel, not to the host. Yep, that's the one, I thought the question was about the guest. The host is running 2.6.11.8 - no extra patches at all.
> > The really weird thing is that the processes are still running, but ps > > -ef shows an empty string in place of the process name: > > (and the terminal which launched the instance got control back) > > I am now rebuilding a new kernel on another test box, let me know what > > to do to provide better debug information. > > It's not unusual for UML processes to have strange names (including empty > ones) on the host. Strange thing is, they had names up to the point where I got the segfault.
Antoine
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |