[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] DRM depends on ???
    > Why is that case invalid? I may have DRM=y so I get DRM on my
    > PCI graphichs card. Then I might load an agp module in order
    > to use agp on *some other* agp card. I have no problem with DRM=y,AGP=m being
    > invalid for the common
    > single-card setup, but there are multi-card setups too. Not that
    > I need this special case personally - I have two cards but don't use modules.

    Yes but the support costs for me of allowing that second case aren't
    worth it, if people have a special case they don't lose anything by having
    AGP supported DRM in the kernel or AGP in the kernel all the time..
    whereas I don't have to answer a load of questions from people whose AGP
    cards stop working because they build DRM into the kernel and AGP as a


    David Airlie, Software Engineer / airlied at
    Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-30 13:24    [W:0.022 / U:2.732 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site