![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
kus Kusche Klaus wrote: > When I was told to analyze whether linux is suitable for our > needs, any nanokernel or two-OS approaches were excluded from the > beginning: Mgmt thought that due to their nature and complexity, > such approaches are not able to offer any improvements w.r.t. what > we have now. Clearly, "one system and one source" is wanted! > You don't explain how making the Linux kernel hard-RT will be so much simpler and more supportable! Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-30 11:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||