Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:21:49 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
Bill Huey (hui) wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:21:20AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >>And my questions for which I got no answer were things like >>"why is a single kernel superior to a nanokernel for hard-RT?", >>"what deterministic services would a hard-RT Linux need to provide?" > > > That's an RT begineer's question. You have to at least be up to speed > in that one to have the conversation at hand and folks have discussed > this repeatedly. It's not our end that failing and clearly you not > understanding this only reenforces this point.. >
Bill, you can belittle me to your heart's content. It really doesn't bother me in the slightest.
Whenever you or anyone else try to complicate the Linux kernel with hard-RT stuff, I'm going to ask exactly the same questions because I don't think you know how a nanokernel solution would work, or even what kind of services a hard-RT Linux would need to provide.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |