Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 May 2005 10:03:09 +0200 (CEST) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] DRM depends on ??? |
| |
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Kyle Moffett wrote: > On May 29, 2005, at 15:58:10, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > What Kyle said is the correct answer... we either keep this lovely > > > construct (I'll add a comment for 2.6.13) or we go back to the old > > > intermodule or module_get stuff... DRM built-in with modular AGP is always > > > wrong... or at least I'll get a hundred e-mails less every month if I > > > say it is .. > > > > And what if we don't have AGP at all? Or no PCI? > > Then DRM detects that at configure time and excludes the code that requires > AGP. Basically, the following are valid configurations:
OK. So we still need the dependency on PCI.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |