lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
Dinakar wrote:
> As far as I can see only the ones marked "<----" should be under the
> dentry lock, considering the fact that it already holds the cpuset_sem
> all the while.

It looks that way to me, too.

I doubt we had any particular reason for locking entry as early
as we do in that code.

It's ok by me if you move the dentry lock lower, as you suggest.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-03 17:35    [W:0.755 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site