Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 May 2005 08:31:04 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5) |
| |
Dinakar wrote: > As far as I can see only the ones marked "<----" should be under the > dentry lock, considering the fact that it already holds the cpuset_sem > all the while.
It looks that way to me, too.
I doubt we had any particular reason for locking entry as early as we do in that code.
It's ok by me if you move the dentry lock lower, as you suggest.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |