[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

On Mon, 2 May 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> It's still simple in Mercurial, but more importantly Mercurial _won't
> need it_. Dropping history is a work-around, not a feature.

Side note: this is what Larry thought about BK too. Until three years had
passed, and the ChangeSet file was many megabytes in size. Even slow
growth ends up being big growth in the end..

We had been talking about pruning the BK history as long back as a year

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.122 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site