[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

    On Mon, 2 May 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > It's still simple in Mercurial, but more importantly Mercurial _won't
    > need it_. Dropping history is a work-around, not a feature.

    Side note: this is what Larry thought about BK too. Until three years had
    passed, and the ChangeSet file was many megabytes in size. Even slow
    growth ends up being big growth in the end..

    We had been talking about pruning the BK history as long back as a year

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.048 / U:2.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site