[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Middeweken 25 Mai 2005 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > - New Xtensa architecture: Tensilica Xtensa CPU series.
> I noticed this has another copy of all the backwards compatibility
> syscalls in its arch/*/kernel/syscall.c file. This doesn't make
> sense for a new architecture added to the tree.
> Chris, are there any existing binaries that rely on your implementations
> of old_mmap, sys_fork, sys_vfork, sys_olduname or sys_ipc and need to
> work with future kernels? Otherwise, you should probably drop these.
> For sys_ipc, you would need to add the subcalls directly to the table,
> like parisc does.

We should do that either way. If people have existing binaries relying
on broken thing before submitting ports for review it's their fault.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-28 09:11    [W:0.127 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site