Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 28 May 2005 08:07:14 +0100 | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 |
| |
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Middeweken 25 Mai 2005 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > - New Xtensa architecture: Tensilica Xtensa CPU series. > > I noticed this has another copy of all the backwards compatibility > syscalls in its arch/*/kernel/syscall.c file. This doesn't make > sense for a new architecture added to the tree. > > Chris, are there any existing binaries that rely on your implementations > of old_mmap, sys_fork, sys_vfork, sys_olduname or sys_ipc and need to > work with future kernels? Otherwise, you should probably drop these. > For sys_ipc, you would need to add the subcalls directly to the table, > like parisc does.
We should do that either way. If people have existing binaries relying on broken thing before submitting ports for review it's their fault.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |