lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
    On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Middeweken 25 Mai 2005 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > >
    > > - New Xtensa architecture: Tensilica Xtensa CPU series.
    >
    > I noticed this has another copy of all the backwards compatibility
    > syscalls in its arch/*/kernel/syscall.c file. This doesn't make
    > sense for a new architecture added to the tree.
    >
    > Chris, are there any existing binaries that rely on your implementations
    > of old_mmap, sys_fork, sys_vfork, sys_olduname or sys_ipc and need to
    > work with future kernels? Otherwise, you should probably drop these.
    > For sys_ipc, you would need to add the subcalls directly to the table,
    > like parisc does.

    We should do that either way. If people have existing binaries relying
    on broken thing before submitting ports for review it's their fault.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-28 09:11    [W:0.024 / U:35.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site