[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Playing with SATA NCQ
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>I double checked this. If you agree to move the setting of QCFLAG_ACTIVE
>>>_after_ successful ap->ops->qc_issue(qc) and clear it _after_
>>>__ata_qc_complete(qc) then I can just use that bit and kill
>>>What do you think?
>>Fine with me.
>>Keep in mind that the attached patch was applied recently...
> Yeah, the two hunks from the ncq patch would look like this then. Ok?

ACK (modulo my distaste for 'depth' and 'ncq_depth', of course... :))

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-27 10:00    [W:0.090 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site