Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 27 May 2005 03:51:11 -0400 | | From | Jeff Garzik <> | | Subject | Re: Playing with SATA NCQ |
| |
Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Jens Axboe wrote: >> >>>I double checked this. If you agree to move the setting of QCFLAG_ACTIVE >>>_after_ successful ap->ops->qc_issue(qc) and clear it _after_ >>>__ata_qc_complete(qc) then I can just use that bit and kill >>>ATA_QCFLAG_ACCOUNT. >>> >>>What do you think? >> >>Fine with me. >> >>Keep in mind that the attached patch was applied recently... > > > Yeah, the two hunks from the ncq patch would look like this then. Ok?
ACK (modulo my distaste for 'depth' and 'ncq_depth', of course... :))
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |