lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Playing with SATA NCQ
    Jens Axboe wrote:
    > On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    >
    >>Jens Axboe wrote:
    >>
    >>>I double checked this. If you agree to move the setting of QCFLAG_ACTIVE
    >>>_after_ successful ap->ops->qc_issue(qc) and clear it _after_
    >>>__ata_qc_complete(qc) then I can just use that bit and kill
    >>>ATA_QCFLAG_ACCOUNT.
    >>>
    >>>What do you think?
    >>
    >>Fine with me.
    >>
    >>Keep in mind that the attached patch was applied recently...
    >
    >
    > Yeah, the two hunks from the ncq patch would look like this then. Ok?

    ACK (modulo my distaste for 'depth' and 'ncq_depth', of course... :))


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-27 10:00    [W:0.051 / U:88.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site