| | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 | | Date | Fri, 27 May 2005 23:13:19 +0200 |
| |
On Middeweken 25 Mai 2005 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote: > > - New Xtensa architecture: Tensilica Xtensa CPU series.
I noticed this has another copy of all the backwards compatibility syscalls in its arch/*/kernel/syscall.c file. This doesn't make sense for a new architecture added to the tree. Chris, are there any existing binaries that rely on your implementations of old_mmap, sys_fork, sys_vfork, sys_olduname or sys_ipc and need to work with future kernels? Otherwise, you should probably drop these. For sys_ipc, you would need to add the subcalls directly to the table, like parisc does.
Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|