lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

    [side-note]

    Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
    > If you are truly interested, there are a lot of papers about RT. There
    > are nanokernel implementations and patents you can review, and there is
    > a lot of controversy.

    Please drop the patent topic, it hasn't been relevant for years. If
    you search the LKML archives for the initial release of Adeos, you
    will see a thread where that specific topic is cleared up. If still
    in doubt, do read the actual relevant patent application(s?), you
    will see that no nanokernel/hyervisor out there fits the described
    method. Not to mention that hypervisors/nanokernels have been there
    for decades ... The specific patent that covers dual-kernels does
    not even attempt to claim it covers the broad world of nanokernels/
    hypervisors.

    Hope this clears this bit, and please don't drag this further. That
    particular topic has been debated more than enough, and I've said
    what I had to say about it many times already. From that point of
    view, I fully agree with you that there's no need to waste people's
    time further.

    With that said, let's go back to talking about the actual technical
    arguments :D

    Karim
    --
    Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
    Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
    http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-27 19:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site