Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 May 2005 18:35:38 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Or change (almost) all calls to might_sleep() into calls to > cond_reched(), and put a might_sleep() inside cond_reched().
indeed
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.1/1422.html
Who on earth would ever compile a kernel with PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n? That's just a marketing word and useless config option as far as I can tell. Anyway it's just source code overhead, at runtime the code is the same, so I don't care after all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |