lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

    * Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:

    > AFAIK the kernel has quite regressed recently, but that was not true
    > (for reasonable sound) at least for some earlier 2.6 kernels and some
    > of the low latency patchkit 2.4 kernels.

    (putting my scheduler maintainer hat on) was this under a stock !PREEMPT
    kernel? If you can reproduce it personally, could you try the
    PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY option available in 2.6.12-rc5-mm1? [Despite its name
    it only adds cond_resched()s, not any heavier preempt mechanism.]

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-27 16:02    [W:0.023 / U:30.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site