lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

* Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:

> AFAIK the kernel has quite regressed recently, but that was not true
> (for reasonable sound) at least for some earlier 2.6 kernels and some
> of the low latency patchkit 2.4 kernels.

(putting my scheduler maintainer hat on) was this under a stock !PREEMPT
kernel? If you can reproduce it personally, could you try the
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY option available in 2.6.12-rc5-mm1? [Despite its name
it only adds cond_resched()s, not any heavier preempt mechanism.]

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-27 16:02    [W:1.587 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site