[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

* Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> AFAIK the kernel has quite regressed recently, but that was not true
> (for reasonable sound) at least for some earlier 2.6 kernels and some
> of the low latency patchkit 2.4 kernels.

(putting my scheduler maintainer hat on) was this under a stock !PREEMPT
kernel? If you can reproduce it personally, could you try the
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY option available in 2.6.12-rc5-mm1? [Despite its name
it only adds cond_resched()s, not any heavier preempt mechanism.]

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-27 16:02    [W:0.217 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site