[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [OT] pull request notation
    Junio C Hamano wrote:
    >>>>>>"JG" == Jeff Garzik <> writes:
    > JG> Please pull the 'new-ids' branch from
    > JG>
    > JG> rsync://
    > JG>
    > JG> This add...
    > I am not a kernel developer, but I think the way this particular
    > pull request is worded can be made much more friendly to Cogito
    > users (that probably is the rest of the world except you, me and
    > Linus ;-). They use URL fragment notation to express the branch
    > head, like this:
    > rsync://
    > At least for me, eyes always skip to the "rsync://..." part
    > immediately after seeing "Please pull.." part.
    > For Linus I am willing to volunteer updating git-pull-script to
    > take the same URL fragment notation, but as Jeff correctly
    > pointed out it already takes the "branch" name as its second
    > parameter so it probably would not be necessary.

    It's up to Linus really, he's the consumer of these messages.

    Given that git-pull-script requires two arguments, URL and optional
    branch, it sounds like
    new-ids' would be the best syntax, if it weren't for darned word wrap.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-26 04:44    [W:0.022 / U:8.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site