lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 24 May 2005 08:45:22 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> Personally I think interrupt threads, spinlocks as sleeping mutexes 
> and PI is something we should keep out of the kernel tree. [...]

it's not really a problem - they integrate nicely. They also found 
dozens of hard-to-catch bugs already so if you dont care about embedded 
systems at all then worst-case you can consider it a spinlock debugging 
mechanism, with the difference that DEBUG_SPINLOCK is far uglier ;) 
Anyway, this discussion is premature, as i'm not submitting all these 
patches yet.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-24 08:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2008