![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 10:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > so it's well worth the effort, but there's no hurry and all the changes > are incremental anyway. I can understand Daniel's desire for more action > (he's got a product to worry about), but upstream isnt ready for this > yet. Ouch.. Let me disclaim my email , I'm writing for me and no one else. I'm just a sponsored kernel hacker... Are you worried about RedHat products? The main reason for my email is that I know Andrew and Linus don't want interrupts in threads. Without that there is no PREEMPT_RT . If you want to narrow the discussion to just interrupts in threads that's fine with me, cause that's what I'm concerned about. There has been some version of interrupts in threads running around for almost a year now. To me that's mature enough to be "unstable". Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-24 18:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||