![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 20 May 2005, Patrick McFarland suggested tentatively: > As everyone knows, Joerg Schilling has a blog, and he often pushes his > pro-Solaris agenda, and flames the LKML about how Linux breaks cdrecord > (instead of just admitting cdrecord is broken) or how much more awesome > Solaris is compared to Linux. > > Well, he just fired yet another salvo at the Linux community: > http://schily.blogspot.com/2005/04/value-marketing-and-freedom.html His research sucks. : Later, the LGPL has been created and parts of the GCC (libgcc) has : been put under LGPL. Wrong. It is trivial to check gcc/libgcc*c and observe that libgcc is *not* LGPLed, but licensed under the GPL plus an exception permitting unrestricted linkage to proprietary software. (Related exceptions are used for the libstdc++ headers and the Ada runtime.) Just before that, he said: : This acceptance has not been present from the beginning. In the : beginning, the whole GCC has been published under the GPL and thus could : not be used to compile software that itself has not been published under : the GPL. For this reason, there has been an excited discussion about the : usability of GCC. Note that in Joerg's worldview, a mistake equals conspiracy. This is a classic kook's mindview. Jeff's right: the best thing we can do is to just ignore him. -- `Once again, I must remark on the far-reaching extent of my ladylike nature.' --- Rosie Taylor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-23 15:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||