![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:15:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sunday 22 May 2005 23:09, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Linus, > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:40:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > (...) > > > - Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.0 > > > + Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 > > (...) > > > then you just add a line saying > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.org> > > > > Why not change this slightly to something like : > > > > DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.org> > > > > which would imply that this person has read (and agreed with) version 1.1 ? > > > > Ugh, that's ugly, long and redundant. You could have: > > DCO-m.n: Random J Developer <random@developer.org> > > but it still looks ugly. Well, it could be anything ugly. The advantage of keeping the "Signed-off-by" is that tools which already rely on this string will still find it. Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-23 09:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||