Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Date | Sun, 22 May 2005 20:51:17 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 19:44 +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:14:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 09:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 22 May 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > > > Linus, please do not apply patches from me which have my personal > > > > information mangled or removed. > > > > > > I've asked Russell not to do it, but the fact is, he's worried about legal > > > issues, and while I've also tried to resolve those (by having the OSDL > > > lawyer try to contact some lawyers in the UK), that hasn't been clarified > > > yet. > > > > there is a potential nasty interaction with the UK moral rights thing > > where an author can demand that his authorship claim remains intact... > > so if David objects to his authorship being mangled (and partially > > removed) he may have a strong legal position to do so. > > Actually, that only depends on whether you decide that Signed-off-by: > reflects authorship.
author David Woodhouse <dwmw2@org.rmk.(none)> Sat, 21 May 2005 15:52:23 +0100
that looks far more like an authorship statement and is also munged.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |