![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> Hi Chen, > With the added branch and the extra icache footprint, it isn't clear > that this would be a win. > > Also, you didn't say where your statistics came from (what workload). > > So you really need to start by demonstrating some increase on some workload. > > Also, minor comments on the patch: please work against mm kernels, > please follow > kernel coding style, and don't change schedstat output format in the > same patch > (makes it easier for those with schedstat parsing tools). > Hi Nick, Thank you very much for your comments. This is the first time of my kernel hacking. I will reduce the lines of changes as much as possible. As regard to the statistics, there are just count, ie, the total number of priority-recalculations vs. the number of priority changed from the former recalculation. Thanks again, -chen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-20 06:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||