Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: The return of PWC | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Mon, 02 May 2005 18:45:02 +0100 |
| |
On Llu, 2005-05-02 at 01:29, Nemosoft Unv. wrote: > In case you hadn't noticed, that code has been reverse compiled (I would not > even call it "reverse engineered"), and is simply illegal. Maybe not in > every country, but certainly in some. There are still some intellectual > property rights being violated here, you know, and I'm surprised at the > contempt you and Linux kernel maintainers show in this regard for a few > lines of the law.
Reverse engineering in the EU for compatibility is legal. It was done in the EU. Linux exists because the law is sensible and allows such actions, its the same reason you aren't still buying all your flush toilets from Thomas Crapper & Son.
> Now don't get started on "it was GPL code before you left bla bla" or "you > should not have abonded the project bla bla blah" and "this court here has > ruled reverse engineering is allowed and so on mumble mumble".
Don't like facts ? The legal position on reverse engineering is in general fairly clear. What you describe might not be. If so then we need to find someone who hasn't read the code to rewrite it from the algorithm description of the current code. Shouldn't take more than a week.
[Its the difference between disassembling the code and publishing a form of the disassembly and writing a new implementation of the algorithm. One is copyright violation the other is reverse engineering]
> Anyway, I'll inform my contacts at Philips tomorrow. I don't know how they > will react; maybe they'll go nuts, maybe they'll let it pass quitely; it's
I *am* concerned by your comments about how the reverse work may have been done, and whether proper process was followed. I'd be greatful if you would forward me your contact at Philips too. You are considered as having an axe to grind and I'd rather discussion occurred between Philips and the Linux community than via yourself.
You've also said yourself that the NDA you had was expired so the previous lack of a GPL module is your personal agenda and nothing to do with anyone else. That makes me wonder what your real goal is.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |