![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Dinakar Guniguntala wrote: > Ok, Here is the minimal patchset that I had promised after the > last discussion. > The sched-domains part of it (kernel/sched.c) is looking much better now. Haven't had a really good look, but it is definitely on the right track now. Well done. As I said before, I am not expert on the cpusets side of things, but as far as sched-domains partitioning goes, we really just want the absolute minimum support in kernel/sched.c which can be managed by a higher layer. I'll review it in detail when it gets into -mm, but I don't expect to find any major problems. Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-02 11:14 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||