lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 19 May 2005 21:12:01 +0900
From"Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" <>
SubjectRe: HT scheduler: is it really correct? or is it feature of HT?
Thanks for nice hints!!  I'm trying with several values, and found
actually as you said, it affects the nice=0 process.

On 5/19/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> Your code does not do what you think it is doing either. If you want to change
> the bias between nice levels across logical cores search the code for where
> the value of sd->per_cpu_gain is set. It is currently set to 25% and you want
> to increase it (although as I said you will derive no real world benefit as
> your nice 0 task will just slow down).
> 
> Cheers,
> Con
> 


-- 
Luckiest in the world / Weapon of Mass Distraction
http://maverick6664.bravehost.com/
Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/
Background: http://maverick.ns1.name/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-19 14:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008