Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 1/7] BSD Secure Levels: printk overhaul | From | Bernd Petrovitsch <> | Date | Thu, 19 May 2005 12:39:45 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 18:29 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:23 -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote: [...] > > @@ -198,15 +196,15 @@ > > static int seclvl_sanity(int reqlvl) > > { > > if ((reqlvl < -1) || (reqlvl > 2)) { > > - seclvl_printk(1, KERN_WARNING, "Attempt to set seclvl out of " > > - "range: [%d]\n", reqlvl); > > + seclvl_printk(1, KERN_WARNING "%s: Attempt to set seclvl out " > > + "of range: [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, reqlvl); > > Instead of changing each and every seclvl_printk() call to add > __FUNCTION__, why not do this: > > +static void __seclvl_printk(int verb, const char *fmt, ...) > ... > > #define seclvl_printk(verb, fmt, arg...) \ > __seclvl_printk(verb, __FUNCTION__ ": " fmt, arg) > > It requires that the fmt be a string literal, but it saves a lot of code > duplication. I'm sure there are some more examples of this around as
And it duplicates identical format strings in different functions (besides violating another unwritten rule). What about: ---- snip ---- #define seclvl_printk(verb, fmt, arg...) \ __seclvl_printk((verb), "%s: " fmt, __FUNCTION__, arg) ---- snip ----
Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |