[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFT PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.6)
    Dinakar wrote:
    > > * The name 'nodemask' for the cpumask_t of CPUs that are siblings to CPU i
    > > is a bit confusing (yes, that name was already there). How about
    > > something like 'siblings' ?
    > Not sure which code you are referring to here ?? I dont see any nodemask
    > referring to SMT siblings ?

    This comment was referring to lines such as the following, which appear
    a few places in your patch (though not lines you wrote, just nearby
    lines, in all but one case):

    cpumask_t nodemask = node_to_cpumask(cpu_to_node(i));

    I was thinking to change such a line to:

    cpumask_t sibling = node_to_cpumask(cpu_to_node(i));

    However, it is no biggie, and since it is not in your actual new
    code, probably should not be part of your patch anyway.

    There is one place, arch_destroy_sched_domains(), where you added such a
    line, but there you should probably use the same 'nodemask' name as the
    other couple of places, unless and until these places change together.

    So bottom line - nevermind this comment.

    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-18 23:08    [W:0.019 / U:19.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site