[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000
Christoph Lameter <> writes:

> On Tue, 17 May 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
>> > Because physically contiguous memory is usually better than virtually
>> > contiguous memory? Any reason that physically contiguous memory will
>> > break the driver?
>> The issue is whether size can end up being too large for
>> kmalloc() to satisfy, whereas vmalloc() would be able to
>> handle it.
> Oww.. We need a NUMA aware vmalloc for this?

You can do that already by just changing process NUMA policy temporarily
while calling vmalloc.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-18 15:24    [W:0.060 / U:9.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site