![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:29 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > I think you missed the part where disabling the writecache decreases the > > mtbf of your disk by like a factor 100 or so. At which point your > > dataloss opportunity INCREASES by doing this. > > Nah, if that were a factor of 100, then it should have been in the OEM > manuals, no? Why would they? Windows doesn't do it. They only need to advertise MTBF in the default settings (and I guess in Windows). They do talk about this if you ask them. > So? one sample doesn't prove the statistics are wrong. > > > Sure you can waive rethorics around, but the fact is that linux is > > improving; there now is write barrier support for ext3 (and I assume > > reiserfs) for at least IDE and iirc selected scsi too. > > See the problem: "I assume", "IIRC selected...". There is no > list of corroborated facts which systems work and which don't. I have > made several attempts in compiling one, posting public calls for data > here, no response. well what stops you from building that list yourself by doing the actual work yourself? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-16 16:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||