lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Sync option destroys flash!
On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:00:34 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Or it may even be cheaper to "burn" a few - buy one of each type from
> various shops, do 2 million writes to the same sector and take them back
> the next day if they died [And publish the review data 8))]

Or just accept the fact that flashes are a tad different from spinning
rust. Expecting a decent wear levelling on the cheap USB sticks and
other forms of flash is plain unrealistic.

USB stick are a bit better than old 3.5" floppies were - if both are
used with fat, minix, ext, etc. At least they don't die by lying in a
dark drawer. But if you want them to last, your best bet is currently
to use JFFS2 on them.

Of course, JFFS2 sucks performance-wise, so the end result currently
is that USB sticks suck in some way, no matter what you try.

Jörn

--
Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it.
Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it.
-- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept. 1982
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-14 12:21    [W:0.117 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site