Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 May 2005 12:01:18 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-) |
| |
Hi!
> >There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it > >actually works. > > > >Now, I'd like to clean it a bit more and then submit it to akpm for > >-mm series. Will someone hate me for doing that? > > > > > Initial look over the patch looks reasonable; no functionality changes, > just code reduction. That said, I would like to pass it through a quick > validation cycle before its picked up. > > We submitted ipw2100-1.1.0 to netdev a month or so ago. I would like to > see it go in to -mm through the netdev tree. I'll ask our QA folks to > run this patch through a quick regression cycle here just to do a sanity > check on it. Assuming nothing comes up, and if Jeff hasn't merged the > ipw2100 code yet, I'll resubmit the ipw2100 driver w/ your patch applied.
Ok. [I may try and do more similar cleanups soon.]
> Part of the process we have in place is to try and make sure that the > versions that get picked up by distros and the majority of users have a > 'known' level of quality. As part of that, we only want to get changes > pushed to -mm and eventual mainline that have gone through regression > testing. > > Sound workable?
Yes... Maybe it would be better to have regression testing between -mm and mainline. I.e. allow "good looking" changes go to -mm, so that -mm tree gets nice, small patches, but only dump changes from -mm to -linus when it actually works.
Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |