[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability
    On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andy Isaacson wrote:

    > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:32:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
    > > >
    > >
    > > Already read it. This link provides no more information than either of
    > > the above links provide.
    > He's posted his paper now.
    > It's a side channel timing attack on data-dependent computation through
    > the L1 and L2 caches. Nice work. In-the-wild exploitation is
    > difficult, though; your timing gets screwed up if you get scheduled away
    > from your victim, and you don't even know, because you can't tell where
    > you were scheduled, so on any reasonably busy multiuser system it's not
    > clear that the attack is practical.
    > -andy
    > -

    Wouldn't scheduling appear as a rather big time delta (in measuring the
    cache access times), so you would know to disregard that data point?

    (Just wondering... :-) )

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-13 20:34    [W:0.022 / U:5.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site