![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > The latest patches seem to do tick skipping rather than wholesale > ticklessness. Admittedly, the latter is a more invasive change, but one If you are referring to my i386 patch, that was only a hack to test the scheduler change! > that may end up being simpler in the long run. But maybe George did a > design like that in the past and rejected it? -- Thanks and Regards, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs, Bangalore, INDIA - 560017 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-13 08:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||