![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Nick Piggin wrote: > Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org> wrote: > >Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote: > >>If Andrew agrees, then I'll commit to doing this cleanup; > >>- (to a limited degree) no trailing whitespace > >I just ran a script over -rc4 to remove trailing ws. The result is > >about 22 MB in 429 patches (iterated over ./*/*). > > > >How hard can I patch you before you start patching me? > > > >Which addresses am I supposed to send it to? I don't want to break the > >record for the most annoying patch series in lkml. > > > > First of all, why is it 429 patches? Because 1) some parts will get rejected due to conflicting patches. Only those parts will need to be recreated. 2) i forgot to create the 430th patch. > The patches we want aren't about a > file or a subdirectory or even a subsystem, but they're supposed to be > a logical change. Ie. 1 patch. That would be too large for most mailboxes. If you like a single patch, you can just concatenate all the patches, so splitting it was a safe bet. > An exception for something like this would > be if you want to feed it to different maintainers seperately, but it > sounds like you just want to bomb it somewhere... I asume there is no automatic way to get the maintainer from a given file, and I don't want to grow old and grey while doing that manually. -- "Bravery is being the only one who knows you're afraid." -David Hackworth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-12 07:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||