![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:56:01AM +0200, Per Liden wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:17:12AM +0200, Per Liden wrote: > > > I'd like to get a better understanding of that as well. Why invent a > > > second on demand module loader when we have kmod? The current approach > > > feels like a step back to something very similar to the old kerneld. > > > > kmod is not used at all if you are running udev on your system. > > Since when does udev load modules for you? It does not. That was my point :) > And how would it know when to load "device less" modules such as > filesystems? Ah damm, I forgot about those pesky things. Oh well, my plot to rid the kernel of kmod will take a few more years... greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-11 07:38 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||