![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 16:03 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 02:48 +0700, Rudolf Usselmann wrote: > > All my problems started when I "upgraded" to x86_64 ... > > > > And you are surprised by this? > > I don't know why so many users buy an arch that didn't exist two years > ago and expect it to be 100% as reliable as 32 bit i386 which has been > around for 20 plus years. I see tons of bug reports where people don't > bother to mention that "oh, btw this is a mixed 32/64 bit environment" > or whatever. > > When you make the choice to live on the bleeding edge, these things will > happen. If you don't like filling out bug reports stick with a 32 bit > machine ;-) > > Lee Hi Lee, no I am not surprised ! But, hey, if nobody tries, we will never debug it, right ?! ;*) I did fill out a bug report several month ago (and did not mind it), I was just following up because I didn't hear anything about it in quite sometime ! Best Regards, rudi ============================================================= Rudolf Usselmann, ASICS World Services, http://www.asics.ws Your Partner for IP Cores, Design, Verification and Synthesis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-11 07:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||