Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: High res timer? | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Tue, 10 May 2005 17:29:01 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 14:16 -0700, Andre Eisenbach wrote: > 2005/5/10, Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@tiscali.de>: > > > > What about nanosleep ()? > > > > nanosleep() seems to have some latency very similar to usleep(). Isn't > usleep based on nanosleep()? > > Here's what I get if I try to nanosleep for 5 secs (for testing): > > -> 5.009952 s > > The .009952 part varies, but is very close to that usually.
Is this a 2.4 kernel? The resolution on 2.6 should be 1ms, not ~10ms.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |