lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: High res timer?
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 14:16 -0700, Andre Eisenbach wrote:
    > 2005/5/10, Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@tiscali.de>:
    > >
    > > What about nanosleep ()?
    > >
    >
    > nanosleep() seems to have some latency very similar to usleep(). Isn't
    > usleep based on nanosleep()?
    >
    > Here's what I get if I try to nanosleep for 5 secs (for testing):
    >
    > -> 5.009952 s
    >
    > The .009952 part varies, but is very close to that usually.

    Is this a 2.4 kernel? The resolution on 2.6 should be 1ms, not ~10ms.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-10 23:35    [W:0.022 / U:0.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site