Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 May 2005 13:43:33 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II |
| |
* Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:59:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:38:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:36:54AM -0400, Christopher Warner wrote: > > > > > 2.6.11.5 kernel, > > > > > Tyan S2882/dual AMD 246 opterons > > > > > sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd ffff810005974cc8(00007ffffffffe46). > > > > > sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd ffff810005974cd0(00007ffffffffe47). > > > > > > > > That's the 3rd or 4th time I've seen this reported on this hardware. > > > > It's not exclusive to it, but it does seem more susceptible > > > > for some reason. Spooky. > > > > > > It seems to be clear now that it is hardware independent. > > > > > > I actually got it once now too, but only after 24+h stress test :/ > > > > > > I have a better debugging patch now that I will be testing soon, > > > hopefully that turns something up. > > > > Ok, I'm respinning the Fedora update kernel today for other > > reasons, if you have that patch in time, I'll toss it in too. > > The patch has considerable overhead, probably not good idea > for a production rpm.
I don't mind running it here. I've triggered it once, and not hit the WARN_ON(start == end). Current was "sh", not that helpful.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |